SHARIA
October 13, 2014
"Sharia" means
law, or in religious terms, law that follows Islam. In political and social
life, and among Muslim legal theorists, many are the ways of interpreting and
applying the Koran to today's world, far richer and more diverse than schools
of interpreting the US constitution. To say "Sharia law" is at once
redundant and disrespectful to the peacemaking premises by which many devout
Muslims whom I know interpret the law. Among Islamic interpretations of law,
ISIL law enforcement ranks far more fundamentalist and retributivist than its
Saudi neighbor. I cringe when I hear
that “they” impose “Sharia law” with a capital S, as though fundamentalist
retributivism in the name of God, and more generally the assumption that violence
“naturally” demands punishment, isn’t acted out and justified in all religious
and ethical traditions. There is nothing
inherently Islamic about ISIL interpretation of law. There is nothing inherently more civilized
than their indiscriminate summary executions in the way we hold one in four of
the world’s prisoners, indiscriminately incarcerating in the industrial process
we call plea bargaining, caging more and more of them for life without parole,
letting some among them linger for a decade or more before they get the
needle. I propose that we take the “Sharia”
out of our criticism of ISIL’s version of law and order. The fact that they cite the Koran is beside
the moral point: belief that punishment is morally and practically justified is
the problem, there and here. To say that
ISIL imposes “Sharia law” is an ethnocentric, religious slur. Love and peace, hal
No comments:
Post a Comment