Thursday, May 22, 2014

They will be punished


“…[THEY] WILL BE PUNISHED”

Hal Pepinsky, pepinsky@indiana.edu, “peacemaking” at pepinsky.blogspot.com

May 22, 2014

 

                Yesterday, President Obama declared that individuals “accountable” for keeping double books in Veterans Administration hospitals across the country “will be punished.”  Sadly, I find in this president to be retributive, from killing civilians with drones and assassinating US nationals for their speech and associations, to caging deportees, to prosecuting whistleblowers, to ramping up US forces in Poland, at Russia’s European door, and now to discipline individual VA workers for how they have coped with tight budgets and massive demand from wounded veterans.

                For all the good things the president has stood for and gotten done, his attitude leads itself to fighting perpetual war against enemies both foreign and domestic.  Much as I respect his integrity, I believe he has let himself be captured by the military-corporate complex.  And the US media scarcely notice the pattern, for all the partisan, abstract debates they carry from politicians and pundits.  In Ukraine, they focus on Putin.

                As a nation, we lack awareness of how others see us, especially those whose families have been killed by a heartless presence overhead that fires a missile in your direction.  We are so determined to set others straight, that we cannot see how we are seen, we cannot empathize with those we are determined to correct, through retribution pure and not so simple.  Love and peace, hal

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Who's Scarier, US or Russia?


WHO’S SCARIER, US OR RUSSIA?

Hal Pepinsky, pepinsky@indiana.edu, “peacemaking” at pepinsky.blogspot.com

May 4, 2014

 

                Russia has Putin, a former KGB agent, as president.  The US has had Bush I, a former CIA Director under Nixon and Ford, as president.  Either way, one can scarcely explain the firefights between Ukrainian westerners and easterners as the working of a single leader.

                It bothers me that US media concentrate so heavily on personifying Putin as the aggressor.  From 1917 through the Cold War, to drone strikes killing innocent women and children on the other side of the planet, and contesting Russian influence in Syria and support for Iran, who has the greater global reach, who has become allied with its WWII enemy, Germany in pushing for Ukrainian integration into the European neo-liberal political economy?  Who has troops on the other’s border?

                Now that it is US Supreme Court law that soulless for-profit corporations with global private investments, the connection between US-based global corporate aggrandizement and global US military occupation and bombardment is formal US government policy.

                My parents drummed into me that “aggression begets aggression.”  Those who vilify others create resistance.  Living as I do in the primary, bigger aggressor, I wish US journalists and commentators would take a closer look at how scary we are ourselves.                                Love and peace, hal

Friday, May 2, 2014

Thinking Two Steps Ahead on College Sexual Assaults


THINKING TWO STEPS AHEAD ON COLLEGE SEXUAL ASSAULTS

Hal Pepinsky, pepinsky@indiana.edu, “peacemaking” at pepinsky.blogspot.com

May 2, 2014

 

                It is a blessing that the extent to which women who are sexually assaulted and even raped on college campuses, and simultaneously in the armed forces is becoming recognized.  It is destructive for the US vice president to proclaim zero tolerance for sexual assailants, and mandatory reporting.

                My most emotionally draining was when I met with mothers whose apparently predatory fathers and grandparents were trying to take custody of children away from them.  It was common for them to have accumulated six-figure lawyers’ bills, in my opinion, doing next to nothing for their clients.  And I saw the devastation caused to a 14-year-old whom a judge in chambers had said he didn’t believe her, and a downward spiral that followed.

It was a blessing that I several times qualified as an expert on “peacemaking, making it safe for children to grow up loving both their parents,” including a mother who was at one point locally jailed for trying to take her children to another state, and grandmother, who for several years volunteered to team teach my senior seminar on “feminist justice: children’s rights and safety.”  It was my co-teachers who introduced me to Jeanette Westbrook, a clinical social worker in Louisville who was born into intergenerational satanic ritual abuse.

                Another memory comes to mind.  There was a student who had been raped and was afraid of being stalked by her assailant.  She was holed up in her apartment for fear of going out.  After an email exchange, I tried calling her, and got no answer.  I worried that she might be suicidal.  I went to the sheriff’s department, and asked them to check on her.  The male deputies brought her into the station where I sat, to get her to press charges.  My memory is of the look of anger and disappointment I saw in her eyes as the deputies escorted her past me.

                I was for several years on the local board for Prevent Child Abuse.  There and when I received my primary mediation training, I was reminded that in Indiana where I taught, every person is a mandatory child abuse reporter.  I openly equivocated, saying that I would leave the child with options, and if I didn’t think the child would be protected by law enforcers, I would not report.

                In sum, in my experience, for children as for co-eds and women in the military, it is odds-on to be thoroughly retraumatized and burdened to advise any victim to go to the police.  It is magical thinking to believe, as my vice president claims, that we can stop sexual violence against women and children by bringing sexual predators to justice.

                Once again, I have heard an npr interviewer ask whether sexual assaults were really increasing, or was there more reporting.  And I have heard an expert equivocate.  I have had long ago to come to terms with my own assaults, both emotionally and physically, that hurt women.  How common the rhetoric was among us college men about how women “really wanted it.”  How oblivious we were, and certainly I was, to the pain and trauma we caused.

                I grew up in the sixties in the era of sexual liberation, when the pill had become available.  For all the openness about sexuality today, I doubt that the culture of young manhood and obliviousness to women’s pain and suffering is much different in colleges today.  I learned decades ago of a survey at the Air Force Academy that got reports of having been sexually assaulted from every female cadet.  And yet here we go again, talking about an epidemic because crime reports are up, as news media continue to do with other crime figures.

                To me, the fundamental cultural barrier to changing this culture is to allow safe spaces for boys and girls to get introduced to sexuality in open conversation with each other as well as from an instructor.  On one hand, there are many of us parents who are quite open to their children’s curiosity about sex and sexuality; on the other, the Puritan streak in U.S. culture makes talking about sex and sexuality, notably in public schools, taboo, on grounds that it is parents’ prerogative to make the discussion taboo at home as well, almost as though the topic is a matter of parents’ free expression of religion for themselves and for their children.

                I have high hopes for my own young grandchildren.  They know how their parents made them, and big sister and younger brother play well together and with both parents.  This is the kind of transition that can take place in two generations.  The rhetoric of further suppressing sexual assault may dominate the airwaves.  It is a rule of peacemaking that the force of change in political culture grows across generations from not being heard at all to overt coming together of politically divided groups.  I have often thought to myself how much of a difference it would have made in my young adulthood if I had known and recognized what women really wanted, and to know sexuality as mutual pleasure rather than “scoring” as it was for me and my male friends.  We are making great strides in recognizing, even celebrating, sexual diversity among adults and teens.  It is one step further to helping men and women to speak a common language of love, and recognition of personal hurt and violence.  Love and peace, hal


Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Response to today's WBUR "On Point!": the topic, stopping domestic terrorism

 My remedy: Let there be a federal law or executive order that henceforth, the US Justice Department have exclusive power to license all single-shot long guns for hunting and for personal protection (modeled on Switzerland, where all men are drafted for training in how to use long guns that they are obliged to disassemble and keep at home to protect the homeland if ever the need arises), AND REQUIRE THAT ALL OTHER PRIVATELY OWNED GUNS MUST BE TURNED IN TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TO DESTROY. Just a thought:-) love and peace, hal

Monday, April 14, 2014

WARNING to ALL computer users!

This "service" is a computer worm, pure and simple.  I use the Microsoft partner RegCurePro's package including cloud backup.  AVOID THE "SERVICE" BELOW!


From: Pepinsky, Harold E.
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 5:18 PM
To: MyPC Backup
Subject: RE: [#3988995] Biggest ever discount today Harold

If I get one more message from you about your worm, I WILL file a formal consumer complaint with the Ohio Attorney General's office.  Desist!  hal

"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres."  Corinthians, chapter 13, verse 4, the verse Jill selected for our wedding vows.

Hal Pepinsky, pepinsky@indiana.edu, skype name halpep, "Peacemaking" at pepinsky.blogspot.com; Ohio Bar registry no. 0024994
 519 Evergreen Circle, Worthington, OH 43085-3667, 1-614-885-6341 1-614-885-6341

Please note:  My mind isn't big enough to handle social networking.  I do not respond to requests to befriend on Facebook or to become Linked In.  That leaves me free to take time to respond to email on this one account, and to answer home phone calls, which I very much enjoy receiving.  Thanks for your understanding.  love and peace--hal
Call
Send SMS
Add to Skype
You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype

________________________________________
From: MyPC Backup [sales@mypcbackup.com]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 5:01 PM
To: Pepinsky, Harold E.
Subject: Re: [#3988995] Biggest ever discount today Harold

Hi Harold,

Thank you for contacting MyPc Backup.

Regrettably we can only reply to emails in English. Please re-phrase your request in English and we will be happy to reply.

This is simply to avoid online translation problems and mis-communication.

Please let us know if you need further assistance, we are more than happy to assist you. We are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

For faster resolution of your issue you may wish to call us on the following numbers:

US/CA: 1-888-851-0954
UK: 0844 445 7025
AU: 61-1800-039-220

Kind Regards,

--
Abigael Gonzaga
Customer Services Representative
MyPC Backup
www.mypcbackup.com

Why (n-1)?



To my fellow criminologists (primarily)
Why (n-1)?
Hal Pepinsky, pepinsky@indiana.edu, “peacemaking” at pepinsky.blogspot.com
April 14, 2014

                My first day in my office in Albany, I made a point of introducing myself to Leslie T. Wilkins.  Shortly thereafter, Les invited me to team teach a seminar in one of the school of crimjus’s core areas: Philosophical Issues of Law and Social Control.  He proposed over lunch that we invite another philosopher from the university.  He first picked Stefan Temesvary, one of only several members of the Astronomy Department (later abolished entirely by a colleague who led the university “task force” in making the decision, as he explained to me at yet another lunch meeting).  Stefan had been forced as a draftee German physicist to develop the V-2 rocket at Peenemunde that was to rain bombs on London; he described watching a rocket “…go up…., and then it came down” with an ironic grin.  Next came Jim McClelland, a philosopher in the Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Education in which my wife Jill received her Sociology Ph.D.  I vividly Jim using his inaugural lecture in our seminar to fill 2 blackboards with symbolic logic as “proof” that only anarchism works.  That seminar remains the highlight of my teaching experiences.  Les, Barb, Jill and I became close friends, and visited them twice in England after Les’s retirement.  I dedicated my 1980 book, Crime Control Strategies, a systems analysis of what it meant when each major measure of crime and criminality, from convictions of crime, through arrests and self-reports, on through measures of criminality down to “recidivism.”
                Les mentored me personally and enthusiastically (often as I sat with him after hours in his living room) throughout our times together.  One thing he pointed out to me was that regression models simply made analyses of variance ordinal rather than descriptive.  And regression was indeed what he brought to his collaboration with Don Gottfredson to create the statistical system that became the first U.S. federal parole guidelines, which as I predicted to Les, soon became perverted into the notorious federal sentencing guidelines, to justify further incarceration rather than to promote safe and early release from prison.
                What struck me as most peculiar about analyses of variance was that the numerator was not simply divided by the total number of cases, but by (n-1).  I accepted implicitly that as Les said, that any 1 case in itself had no variance, and so “n” by itself had no variance, and Les’s insistence that you had to have at least 3 cases to have enough variation to infer variance, but it is only as I write today that I think I can see why, in Euclidean geometric terms.
                In purely mathematical material terms, 1 case equals a dot, a location that has purely unique significance in itself, or in plain English, doesn’t matter at all, or in scientific terms, has no significance.  You have to place one dot in relation to a second dot in order to show what direction they are headed.  You have to have three dots for them together in the “third” dimension in order for them as a group to have any substance at all in common.  And you have to move the three dots toward a fourth in order to show any movement of any substance, the “fourth” dimension commonly known as “time.”
                In social science, dots are called “variables.”  I learned in chapter 2 of my grad statistics text that it is a “fallacy” to “affirm a null hypothesis.”  Suppose we compare a group of people who have never been convicted of a felony, say murder, and find that the people who are black in one population have on average murdered more people than the people who are white.  Individually, the fact that someone happens to be black or white is insignificant—the variable black or white is fixed for each individual who happens to be black or white; it only signifies anything when it is some average of 3 blacks and 3 whites; in itself, the fact that blacks “commit” more “murders” than whites doesn’t even tell you anything but which group of any 3 blacks versus group of 3 whites is more likely include someone convicted of murder.  As for comparing 2 blacks to 2 whites, the odds of any single white or black being among all those convicted of murder is simply fifty-fifty.  The odds of any single black or white person being convicted of murder in my “violent” country are less than one in ten thousand, period.
                My fellow criminologists, please refrain from thinking you know anything about how dangerous or crime-free any individual is by statistical profile.  If this be your “best evidence” of what to expect from any human being you have no firsthand knowledge of, you know nothing.  Love and peace--hal
               

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Think One Step Ahead

THINK ONE STEP AHEAD
Hal Pepinsky, pepinsky@indiana.edu, “peacemaking” at pepinsky.blogspot.com
April 10, 2014

                My wife Jill and I have just survived the most intense moment in our 41 years together, me (in)voluntarily committed to a mental hospital for what turned out to be exactly 30 days, emerging rested and at peace with myself and my body, Jill emotionally exhausted.  I have gotten through it with minimal effort by simply following one peacemaking rule I had long embraced even before I became a volunteer victim-offender mediator in Bloomington, Indiana, in 1997: Think first of how I feel, then pause long enough to pick a way of expressing it that reassures others that I am perfectly safe to be with.  Invariably, living by this one simple rule, I feel safe in any situation, period.  Love and peace--hal